Purpose: The science of INTERPRETATION, as the most important science responsible for understanding the Qur'an, needs to be methodized and updated so that the teachings of the Qur'an can be used easily for all classes of people. In the present study, the meaning of "future research in INTERPRETATION" is the ability to create desirable models for more efficient INTERPRETATION in the future, by using scientific tools, creativity and relying on the foundations and rules of INTERPRETATION and compensating the damages of INTERPRETATION in the past.Method: This research, with descriptive analytical method, answers the question, what are the fields and requirements of future research in INTERPRETATION? Findings: The results of the current research are based on the fact that special attention to the Qur'an, as the most important source of INTERPRETATION, rationality and methodical consideration in INTERPRETATION, attention to the prerequisites of INTERPRETATION, INTERPRETATION based on the requirements of the time, the need to pay attention to thematic INTERPRETATION, studying on the history of INTERPRETATION and observing the manners and conditions of INTERPRETATION are one of the most important requirements of INTERPRETATION in the future. Results: Considering the developments that will take place in the field of knowledge, methods and expectations from science in the future, the INTERPRETATION will also change. For this reason, in order not to cause various damages to the INTERPRETATION of the Qur'an, it is necessary to pay attention to the various contexts, principles and requirements of the INTERPRETATION of the Qur'anic commentators and scholars.

Considering the fact that the words in the intra-religious attitude are considered in two ways, the first is towards jurisprudential words and the second is a rational and conceptual view focusing on their meanings. we have tried to deal with one of the most important issues of intra-religious attitude with a rational approach by descriptive and analytical method, which is the category of "hermeneutic INTERPRETATION" of words, especially the most influential idea of INTERPRETATION & that is the view of the "spirit of meaning" of Ghazali. After Ghazali, Ibn Arabi used this theory of Ghazali regarding the development of meaning in creating his new idea, and by re-reading Ghazali's idea with a mystical approach, he presented his own theory regarding the expansion of meaning. While accepting the argument of the focal point of the theory of the spirit of meaning, he removes it from the exclusivity to the "linear", and for this purpose, he brought up arguments as well as the Conditions of Hermeneutic INTERPRETATION in this regard. Ibn Arabi's arguments on transversal INTERPRETATION include new formulations in the argument, which after him, this theory was favored and accepted by Mulla Sadra, and then it was accepted by his students.

As a result of the principle of the legality of tax, the statute is the main basis in the relationship between the taxpayer and the government and INTERPRETATION. Therefore, the interpretive approach to tax statutes has considerable effects on the legal position of taxpayers as well as the rights and obligations of the taxpayer and the government. Some interpretive approachs, such as literal INTERPRETATION, result in the formation of principles like restrictive INTERPRETATION and INTERPRETATION in favor of taxpayer and enable taxpayers to manage their legal position so as to avoid tax obligations. But legal loopholes resulting from the literal INTERPRETATION of tax statutes might lead to the liberal INTERPRETATION of tax statutes and giving more INTERPRETATION authority to judges on the basis of economic goals of the statute, the purpose of the statute and the intention of legislature in order to resolve the textual ambiguity in a statute. This article attemts to anayze and explain the particular elements and factors of tax statute INTERPRETATION on the basis of scholarly opinions, comparative law studies and judgments of judicial and tax authorities.

Perceiving the meaning of Quranic verses requires its own reasonable method. When enough knowledge of the methods occurs, one can perceive the real intention of commentators. On the other hand, classic hermeneutics has been founded to make us aware of the principles and methods of perceiving the text, and in this way, it has led to vast fundamental changes in the field. Regarding what is common between Quranic exegesis and classic hermeneutics, it is necessary for both to use the findings of one another. Following such an aim, therefore, the paper has studied the most important BASES in the field.

Origin of Intellect in INTERPRETATION from the perspective of Ayatollah Fazel LankaraniAbstract INTERPRETATION means discovering the practical substance and expressing God's intention from the verses of the holy Qur'an, depending on matters that have been determined by the commentators, although in some cases they are in dispute. "Intellect" and "rational perceptions" are among the cases that are considered to be the most important sources of INTERPRETATION by some people and by others , do not have the necessary competence to understand the divine meaning. This article is devoted to examining the views of the contemporary Quranic scholar Ayatollah Fazel in this regard. From this perspective, the correct INTERPRETATION is based on the three main elements of "appearance of verses", "expression of the infallibles" and " Intellect". Ayatollah Fazel considers "intellect" in the discovery of the divine meaning to be prior to the first two pillars, calling it a definite symmetry of verses, which on the one hand sometimes rules the non-appearance of the word in understanding the divine meaning, and on the other hand, it considers the Intermediary evaluation of narrations and its validation to be on conditional ofrational ruling.

In some point of view, neither Michel Foucault nor Ibn Khaldun are considered philosophers in the conventional classifications, but both are very  important in intellectual and, of course, in philosophical contexts, especially for those who are interested in the deep study of human life from the perspective of political thought.The main concern of two thinkers, one in the 14th century, the other in the 20th century, is the issue  of power, although neither of them provided a precise definition of it. In this article, an attempt has been made to show the place of power and domination in the political thought of both thinkers by examining the thoughts of two thinkers. And in search of an answer to this question, how did Asabiyyah and industry of religion in Ibn Khaldun's thought and social control through self-technology and discipline in Foucault's thought lead to the expansion of the domination of power? This article is written by analytically comparing the opinions of two thinkers based on Ibn Khaldun's most important book called Muqaddimah and Foucault's late works

One of the most frequent rules in various areas of demonstrative jurisprudence of Two Major Sects of Islam religion is a rule that is known among Shīʿa as “tolerance in the evidence of traditions” (Arabic: التسامح فی أدلّة السنن) and in Sunnī as “latitudinarianism in documents” (Arabic: التساهل فی أسانید). Believers in the general application of this rule have based it for reasons such as consensus (Arabic: إجماع), tradition famous through practice (Arabic: الشهرة العملیّة), and rational judgement (intellectual judgement) and a group of aḥādīth (Arabic: أحادیث, plural form for ḥadīth, literally “talk” or “discourse”) called “Akhbar-e- Man Balagh” (Arabic: أخبار من بلغ). The understanding of the aforementioned narrations and the extent of application of this rule has caused a conflict of opinions among scholars. The narrations containing the excellences of suras of the Holy Book of Quran is one of the fields of application of the rule of tolerance. The present research has explained the types of exposure to this group of narrations based on the rule of tolerance by using descriptive-exploratory method and using library sources and seeks to find a suitable approach about narrations of the excellences of suras (chapters) of the Holy Book of Quran. The interaction with these narrations is organized based on a special reading of the rule of tolerance in the selected approach, which is based on a rational INTERPRETATION of the contents of Man-Balagh (Arabic: من بلغ)’s narrations and is compatible with the indications of some verses and traditions. The use of weak narrations containing the excellences of suras (chapters) will be permissible based on this approach considering three conditions and without any certainty of attributing these narrations to Sharʿ (Islamic rules).

The present study, titled "Critical Application of the Interpretative Principles of Arushi al-Hawazi (Analysis of the 'Current of Akhbarism' and 'The Certainty of the Transmission of the Narrations of the Four Books'), is based on description and analysis. Arushi al-Hawazi presents an INTERPRETATION of Nur al-Thaqalayn, drawing on the narrations of the Infallibles (AS). In his INTERPRETATION of Nur al-Thaqalayn, due to the influence of the akhbarism tendency, Huwazi limited himself to narrating narrations without evaluating them. As a result, weak and unreliable hadiths were also included. The core issues discussed in this article regarding the INTERPRETATION of Nur al-Thaqalayn are rooted in two factors: "Current of Akhbarism" and "Belief in the Certainty of the Transmission of the Narrations of the Four Books. " The problems caused by the Akhbarism idea include the "lack of authenticity of the Quranic phenomena" and the 'monopoly of Quranic knowledge by the Infallibles (AS). ' The issues related to the "belief in the certainty of transmission of the narrations of the four books" in the INTERPRETATION of Nur al-Thaqalayn are based on the fact that the authors of the four books relied on highly reliable sources, making their narrations definitive. However, firstly, the certainty of each individual is only valid for that person,secondly, prominent scholars such as Kulayni, Sheikh Saduq, and Sheikh Tusi did not always consider the narrations in the "Fundamentals of the Four Months" to be definite. They sometimes questioned the authenticity of the narrations they recorded. Therefore, some examples are quoted and critiqued during this examination.

How to profoundly change the beliefs of the polytheists during the age of revelation from the denial of the Prophet (pbuh) to the certainty of his Message and the acceptance of his full guardianship is a question worthy of attention. The order of verses about prophecy based on the order of revelation is the reason to lead a transformative process and a special Quranic method in institutionalizing the belief of prophecy in the lives of Arabs. In the first stage, the Holy Quran in the first Makkī (Arabic: المکّیّ, suras revealed in Mecca) chapters has prepared the community from the motivational side to accept the truth of the Prophet’s (pbuh) prophecy and briefly stating the key issues surrounding it. The Holy Book of Quran at the time of the emergence of oppositions and doubts (the second stage) destroyed the arguments of the polytheists and explained the prophecy and proved its authenticity from a cognitive perspective in the second stage by presenting clear arguments. and the Holy Book of Quran in the third stage after Madanī (Arabic: المدنیّ, suras revealed in Medina) period has undertaken measures in order to fulfill the goals of the Massage by explaining the true position of the Prophet (pbuh) to deepen and operationalize the Prophetic belief through explaining practical duties for the Prophet (pbuh) and behavior based on the acceptance of Walaya (Arabic: ولایة, meaning “guardianship” or “governance”).

The current research was conducted with the aim of identifying the employment competencies of educational graduates from the perspective of view of employers. This research was applied in terms of purpose and was among the qualitative researches of Grounded Theory type. The participants of this research included 24 employers in the field of educational (interviewers for the Education recruitment exam, directors of non-state educational institutes, directors and recruitment officers of non-state schools, directors of kindergartens and preschools) in Birjand city. Data were collected using semi-structured interview and analyzed by Strauss and Corbin method and using MAXQDA-2020 software. In order to validate the research, two methods of member control and peer review or feedback were used. Consecutive review and comparison of data resulted in the extraction of 28 categories and 6 themes. Data analysis led to the formation of a sub-theory. The model shows that the focal variable is the process of education and teaching skills. The focal variable, under the influence of contextual and intermediate conditions, leads to the formation of the strategies of "being a lifelong learner", "research skills", "planning skills", "classroom skills and classroom management", "purposefulness" and "problem solving skills". became Finally, "increasing employability" was the consequence of this process.